• , •V/UjS V The Leonard Library Wptlitlt College Toronto J Shelf No. &X..££t.Z.a.. Register No. 19 THE OF WILLIAM DOWSING, OF STRATFORD, PARLIAMENTARY VISITOR, APPOINTED UNDER A WARRANT FROM THE EARX. OF MANCHESTER, FOB DEMOLISHING THE SUPERSTITIOUS PICTURES AND ORNAMENTS OP CHURCHES &C., WITHIN THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, IN THE YEAR3 1643—1644. A New Edition, with an Introduction, Notes, etc., by the REV. C. H, EVELYN WHITE, Honorary Secretary of the Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and Natural History, Editor of the Society's Proceedings, and of " The East Anglian Notes and Queries." IPSWICH : PAWSEY AND HAYES, THE ANCIENT HOUSE. MDCCCLXXXV. IPSWICH : TOOTED BT PAW8XT AND HAYES, ANCIENT HOUSE, BUTTER MARKET. THE JOURNAL OF WILLIAM DOWSING, PARLIAMENTARY VISITOR, FOR DEMOLISHING THE SUPERSTITIOUS PICTURES AND ORNAMENTS OF CHURCHES, ETC., WITHIN THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, IN THE TEARS 1&(3— 16^. WITH AN INTRODUCTION, NOTES, ETC. It falls to the lot of comparatively few, other than those whose lives and memories are consecrated in the affections of their fellow men, to acquire and retain so widespread a reputation (in this particular case such an unenviable one) as that which clings to the name and character of that uncompromising zealot of iconoclastic fame, William Dowsing. Judging from the scanty information we possess concerning him, it may possibly appear to some, that so uninviting a character, and one we are led instinctively to condemn, is scarcely worthy of anything likely to further perpetuate his memory, beside that which we already possess in the well-known ' Journal.' Put understanding that the two or three previous editions of the ' Journal ' were out of print, and copies not easily obtainable ; that the ' Journal ' moreover, in its complete form was but little known, and where known, was for the want of a few brief notes, not sufficiently understood, I deemed the present opportunity a favourable one for adding certain information concerning Dowsing and his family connec tions, as far as appear to me correct and reliable. Also some further details, and sundry notes relating to his work in the character in which he is alone known, that of Parliamentary Visitor appointed under a warrant from the Earl of Manchester, for the demolishing of super stitious pictures and ornaments found in Churches, etc., throughout the assigned District. Of the original Manuscript of the l Journal ' nothing is known, further than the fact that it was sold in the year 1704, together with the library of Samuel Dowsing, a son of William Dowsing, to Mr. ftuse, a London bookseller. It was from a transcript of this MS. made at the time, that the edition published by Mr. Loder, of Woodbridge, (4to. 1786) and afterwards a second edition, was issued in 1818. To the transcript was added : — " A true Copy of a MANUSCRIPT, found in the Library of Mr. Samuel Dowsing, of Stratford, being written by his Father, William Dowsing's own Hand, carefully and almost literally transcribed Sept. 5th, 1704." Mention is made in the Suffolk Traveller (2nd ed. p. 39) that a portion of Dowsing's * Journal ' found its way into the hands of the Editor of that work (Mr. John Kirby ), but whether it was any part of the original is not clear. Up to the time of the appearance of Mr. Loder's first edition, copies could only have existed in MS., and it is not surprising that in some such copies, slight differences should be found. The 'Journal' was afterwards reprinted by Messrs. Parker, of Oxford, as a supplement to Wells' " Rich Man's Duty" and afterwards (1850) by the same in a separate form. This present edition, drawn from the several previous editions, and MS. copies, carefully compared with each other, has the several points of difference, etc., duly noted.* Loder's edition has an Introduction which is of quite sufficient interest, in its way, to merit a place here, while it may to some extent serve a like purpose : — "TOWARD the latter end of the reign of HENRY VIII., and throughout the whole reign of EDWARD VI. and in the beginning of * F. C. Brooke, Esq. , of Ufford, with his usual kindness has placed at my disposal an interleaved and annotated edition of the ' Journal ' (Loder, 1818, 4to.), with materials collected for an introduction by the late Mr. John Wodderspoon. I have occasionally availed myself of this, but as it consists mainly of notes illustrative of church ornaments, monuments, coats of arms, rood screens, brasses, stained glass, &c. , and a consideration of these being outside my original purpose, I have gleaned but little fresh information from this source. queen ELIZABETH, certain persons, of every county, were put in authority to pull down, and cast out of all churches, roods, graven images, shrines with their relics, to which the ignorant people came flocking in adoration. Or any thing else, which (punctually) tended to idolatry and superstition. Under colour of this their commission, and in their too forward zeal, they rooted up and battered down crosses in churches and church-yards, as also in other public places, they defaced and brake down the images of kings, princes and noble estates, erected, set up, or portraied, for the only memory of them to posterity, and not for any religious honour ; they crackt a-pieces the glass windows wherein the effigies of our blessed SAVIOR hanging on the cross, or any one of hia saints was depictured ; or otherwise turned up their heels into the place where their heads used to be fixed ; as I have seen in the windows of some of our country churches. They despoiled churches of their copes, vestments, amices, rich hangings, and all other ornaments where upon the story or the portraiture of CHRIST himself, or of any saint or martyr was delineated, wrought, or embroidered ; leaving religion naked, bare, and unclad." " But the foulest and most inhuman action of those times, was the violation of funeral monuments. Marbles which covered the dead were digged up, and put to other uses, tombs hackt and hewn a-pieces ; images or representations of the defunct, broken, erased, cut, or dismembered, inscriptions or epitaphs, especially if they began with an orate pro anima, or concluded with cujus animce propitietur Deus. For greediness of the brass, or for that they were thought to be anti-christian, pulled out from the sepulchres, and purlioned ; dead carcases, for gain of their stone or leaden coffins, cast out of their graves, notwithstanding this request, cut or engraven upon then, propter miserecordiam Jesu requiescant in pace." WEEVER'S Discourses on Funeral Monuments, pa. l.li. What was thought to be left unfinished, by those Persons then in Power, the fanatical Zeal of the succeeding Century pretty fully accomplished ; a reference to this JOURNAL alone, is sufficient to shew, how far the Ignorance and Obstinacy of selfish Men may be persisted in, and carried on, against the Remonstrances of sober and moderate Reason. In the eventful days of the Long Parliament, men in the name of religion, ran to an excess of riot that ill accorded with the spirit by which they were supposed to be actuated, and of this party, William Dowsing may be regarded as a faithful exponent. Those who had assumed authority, held out every encouragement to the lawless fac tion, to persevere in their deeds of ill, and consequently many were to be found ready to distinguish themselves by acts of open violence. According to " Mercurius Xusticus" (p. 22) "In Aug. 1641. -there was an Order published by the House of Commons, for the taking away all scandalous Pictures out of Churches, in which there was more intended by the Authors than at first their instruments understood, untill instructed by private information how faree the People were to inlarge the meaning." It may I think be reasonably supposed, that many of the " reliques of idolatry" were, during the interval of time which elapsed between the giving of this Order and the date of Dowsing' s Commission, forcibly removed by the people, and that it was left for Dowsing to smite and not spare, at the subsequent period. It was soon after the publication of the Order, that country committees were called into existence for the exercise of certain powers conferred upon them by the Parliament, in connection with this undertaking. At the instance, and under the direction of the Earl of Man chester, who received his commission as General of the associated counties of Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk, Lincoln, Huntingdon, Cambridge, and Hertford, in 1642, and resigned it in 1645, William Dowsing received his appointment as Parliamentary Visitor of the Suffolk Churches. Of the five or six associations formed in the interest of the Parliamentarian party, this is the only one that stood its ground. A copy of the original Commission, formerly in the possession of the late D. E. Davy, has never I think been printed. It is as follows — A Commission from the Earle of Manchester. " Whereas by an ordinance of the Lords and Comons assembled in Parliamt bearinge date the 28th day of August last, it is amongst other thinges ordained y' all Crucifixes, Crosses & all Images of any one or more psons of the Trinity, or of the Virgin Marye, & all other Images A praying Monk, hooded and tonsured was the no uncom mon adornment to a bench end, where this ' Fryar ' was probably found. 51 124. UFFORD. "We brake down the Organ cases and gave them to the poor" Such kind consideration for the poor was apparently restricted to a gift of firewood ; what was of real value seems to have entered some other channel. " On the Roof above a 100 Jesus and Mary in great capital letters" A large number of these are still to be seen. " A glorious cover over the Font, fyc" Even the harsh eye of Dowsing could appreciate * a thing of beauty.' This Font Cover is one of the finest specimens in the kingdom, and certainly receives only its due meed of praise, when it is referred to as ' glorious.' It is, all things considered, in a marvellous state of preservation, and the hand of the would-be destroyer seems to have paused, ere it ventured to strike a blow, and the Cover was spared. In several places the delicate tracery has been renewed, but it appears to have been done owing to decay, rather than wantonness. The lower panels of the rood screen, with painted figures, still remain. Bearing in mind the persistency of the Church and parish officials in thwarting Dowsing in the accomplish ment of his purpose, we cannot but wonder that when he "carried away part of the Church "(!) he should have left so much behind, if not absolutely untouched, yet but little the worse for so portentous a visit. 127. SOMERSHAM ('SUMMERSHAM'). 128. FLOWTON ('FLOUGHTON'). 130. OFFTON ('OFTON.') "At Ipswich, at Mr. Coleys." Probably the name should be that of Mr. Jacob Caley, who was elected in 1643 by the "Twenty-four" to be one of that body of Town Governors, and after wards filled the office of Claviger and Guildholder. 132. WILLISHAM (< WILLESHAM.') " The Steps were levelled ; and had so been once before, by a Lord Bishop's Injunction ; and by another Lord Bishop after commanded " &c. The latter has reference to the action of Bishop Matthew Wren in causing an ascent to be made to the 52 Communion Table in the parish Churches throughout the Diocese, generally of three steps. 133. DARMSDEN ('DAMSDEN.') 135. MICKFIELD. " The glasses to be made up" &c. It would appear that the window glass was ordered to be carefully preserved, instead of being ' battered down '; this seems to be a just inference. If too super stitious to remain, why was the glass accounted worthy of preservation?! Anyhow there is here a pleasing variation from the recognized principle, for the poor were to have 10s. and the rest afterwards! Whether this latter sum amounted to 4s. 6d. or whether the 4s. 6d. mentioned may not be regarded as the amount paid to the visitors by the parish, is uncertain, owing to the ambiguity of the entry. 137. ATHELINGTON ('ARLINGTON.') 138. WORLINGWORTH (< WALLINGWORTH.') 139. HOLTON. " I * H * S (he Jesuit's Badge." A very hard and uncalled for epithet to be applied to this ancient monogram, signifying Jesus Hominum Salvator, which really is of Greek, (I H C the first three letters of the Greek JESUS) and not Latin origin. (See also (146) METFIELD, and Jessop's work at GORLESTON.) 144. OCCOLD OOCKOLD.') 145. RISHANGLES (< RUSSINGLES.') 147. DENNINGTON I'DINNINGTON.') " Sr John Rouses Stool" The seat or stall occupied by Sir John. " Thomas Umberfield of STOKE," &c. The Chapel for which Thomas Umberfield was held responsible, was that appertaining to Henry, Lord Windsor, of Bradnam, in the County of Buckingham, through his marriage with Anne, only daughter of Sir Thomas Revett, Knt. It would appear that many brasses (and of course divers other goods and ornaments) being spared by those authorized to demolish them, were subsequently taken away or destroyed by the soldiery during the Common- 53 wealth. Evelyn, in his Diary, alluding to a visit made by him to Lincoln in I 654, says — " The souldiers had lately knocked off most of the brasses from the gravestones (in the Cathedral) so as few inscriptions were left ; they told us that these men went in with axes and hammers, and shut them selves in, till they had rent and torn off some large loads of metal, not sparing even the monuments of the dead, so hellish an avarice possessed them." Good Bishop Hall, of Norwich, draws a sad picture in his "Hard Measure" of the lamentable workings of the ' Spirit of the age.' He says, in the well known passage (p. LXVI) : — " What work was here. What clattering of glasses ! What beating down of walls ! What tearing up of monuments ! What pulling down of seats ! What wresting out of irons and brass from the windows and graves ! Wliat defacing of Arms ! What demolishing of curious stone work, that had not any representation in the world, but only of the coat of the founder, and the skill of the Mason ! What tooting and piping upon the destroyed organ pipes ! And what a hideous triumph on the market-day before all the country ; when, in a kind of sacrilegious and profane procession, all the organ pipes, vestments, both copes and surplices, together with the leaden cross which had been newly sawn down from over the Green-yard Pulpit, and the service books and singing books that could be had, were carried to the fire in the public market place ; a lewd wretch walking before the train, in his cope trailing in the dirt, with a service-book in his hand, imitating in an impious scorn the tune, and usurping the words of the litany used formerly in the Church. Near the Public Cross, all these monuments of idolatry must be sacrificed to the fire ; not without much ostentation of a zealous joy, in discharging ordnance, to the cost of some, who professed how much they had longed to see that day." Two extracts from Blomefield's History of Norfolk, will give some idea of a similar work carried out in that county, and will complete the picture, as pourtrayed by William Dowsing: — "In 1644 — April 7"1' Captain Gilley was paid 6/- by the town for viewing the Church of Bressingham to abolish superstitious pictures, and immediately after, John Nunn was paid for two days work for taking down glass and pictures about the Church and filing the letters off the bells, and it was plain there were many effigies and arms for the glazing of the windows after this reformation came to £2 : 6 : 0. But though several of them were lost, some were preserved and put up in the hall windows, as the emblem of the Trinity, S'- John, Sl- Catherine, O 54 the Virgin and Su Margaret, together with the arms of Verdon (fee. The Church suffered much, for in 1644 £54 : 11 : 8 was raised by rate to put it in order, and to buy its ornaments of all which it was spoiled." Blomefieldp. 70. Vol. i. " In the time of the Rebellion, the Church (Fersfield) was purged of superstition by the rebels, who defaced the carvings of the heads of the seats, with their swords, and hacked the effigies of the bosses. What few brasses there were, were all reaved and several arms broken out of the windows, and the altar rails pulled down. The evidences, king's arms &c. were taken down previously by Mr. Piddock, Church warden, who justly returned them at the Reformation." Blomefieldp. 112. Vol. i. In bringing the ' Notes ' to a conclusion, it is but fair to say, that throughout this unhappy period, the Church fabric always seems to have been respected, but the ruling idea all along, appears to have been to leave the building as bare of ornamentation as circumstances permitted, and expediency required. The disgraceful and often violent depredations, of which the ' Journal ' makes mention, were ostensibly wrought to extirpate idolatry. How far did this succeed ? It may well be questioned whether, supposing gentler modes of treat ment had been used, the desired object would not have far more effectually brought about to the lasting good of both the Church and the Nation. That many foul abuses did exist, and greatly needed to be uprooted with a firm hand is unquestionable, as for instance the many forms of creature and image worship, and their numerous adjuncts, and other objects of superstitious adoration. But far too often the work undertaken by these Parliamentary Visitors was as needless and profane as it was melancholy and indecent, and fraught moreover with no good to the inner life of the Church, unless indeed it be that the purification wrought by adversity, had her ' perfect work.' It only remains for me to summarize the contents of ' Journal,' and this I think can be best done by giving a short view of the districts traversed in the somewhat erratic course, and the time occupied in the whole under- 55 taking1, noting also the several districts of more or less importance, passed over by Dowsing, and his Deputies, at least so far as the entries in the l Journal ' are con cerned. Beginning on the Essex border Jan. 6th, 1643, the parishes of Haverhill, Clare, Hunden, Wixoe, and Withersdale, were visited, and after a break of three days, the town of Sudbury. An interval of ten days elapsed ere the work was resumed, when Stoke by Nayland and Nayland were taken, and two days after, leaving the western division, Raydon and Holton, (?) Barham, Clay don and Coddenham. The next day, Eyke and Tunstall were visited, followed the day after by a visit to Aldborough, the next day Orford, Snape and Stanstead, and the following day Saxmundham, Kelsale, Carleton, Wickham Market and Sudbourne. The day following, Ufford, Woodbridge, Kesgrave, and Rushmere. A day elapsed, when the last two days of the month of January were occupied in visiting Chattisbam, Wash- brook, Copdock, Belstead, Ipswich (12 Churches) and Playford. On the 1st February Great Blakenham, Bramford, Sproughton, Burstall, and Hintlesham were visited. The next day, returning to West Suffolk, Hadleigh, Layham, Shelley and Higham. The day following, having crossed the West Suffolk boundary, the Wenhams and Capel, including Lady Brewse's Chapel, and turning northwards, Needham Market, Badley, Stowmarket, Wetherden, Klmswell, Tostock and Bury St. Edmund's. The next day Kentford and Newmarket, and after an interval of a fortnight, the two Cornards, and the day following Mewton, Nayland, Assington and Stoke (Lord Windsor's Chapel). The next day but one, Bures. Three days after, Glemsford; the day fol lowing, Otley, Monewden, Hoo and Letheringharu. The next day, Easton and Kettleburgh. The next day, Helniingham and Woolpit. The following day being March 1st, Beyton; a month having elapsed, 56 Kayfield, Bedingfield, Tannington and Brandish were visited, and the day following1, Wilby, Stradbrooke, and Linstead Parva. The next day, Linstead Magna, Chedis- ton, Halesworth, Redisham Magna, and Kedingfield, and the day following, Beccles, Elough, Sotterly, Benacre, and Covehithe. Two days after, Rushmere, Mutford, Frostenden, South Cove, Ray don, South wold, and perhaps Walberswick. The next and following day, Blyford, Blythburgh, Dunwich, Bramfield and Hevingham. Five days after, being April 15th, Polstead, Boxstead, and Stanstead. The work was not resumed until July 17th, when Laxfield (the supposed home of the Dowsing's) was officially visited. Five weeks later (August 21st) Trimley St. Martin, Brightwell, Levington, Baylham and Barking. The next day, Nettlestead, Somersham, Flowton, Elmsett, Ofton and Willisham, and the day following, Darmsden. Three days after, Wetheringsett, and Mickfield ; the following day, Horham, Allington and Wallingworth. The next day, Wangford and Wrentham ; the day follow ing, Holton, and the next day being 30th August, Hoxne, Eye, Occold, Rishangles, and Metfield. After an interval of nearly a month, (Sept. 26th) Dennington : the next day but one, Baddingham, and three days after, (Oct. 1st) the work was brought to a conclusion by a visit to Parh am — H atcheston . The Churches in the Hundreds of Mutford and Lothingland were visited by Jessop, the Deputy, and are almost entirely passed over in the * Journal.' It seems likely that only those churches which Dowsing visited, either by himself or in company with the Deputy specially appointed for the work, are mentioned. Thus the town of Bungay, and also the parishes of Yoxford and Ringshall were presumably visited by Jessop and his subordinates, while he was apparently joined in the enterprise of despoiling Blythborough, which was (specially entrusted to him,) by his superior William Dowsing. Probably few, if indeed any suspected churches, were altogether passed by, although the entire number of 57 churches in some of the * Hundreds ' are almost wholly unmentioned. This of course is specially the case with the ' Hundreds' for which Deputies were appointed, as Lackford, (in which is included Wangford) Risbridge, (in which is included Clare), &c., &c. Hartismere, towliich no special appointment seems to have been made, (although Francis Verden ' would have had it '), is poorly represented; so also Olaydon, Thingoe, Blackbourne, Wilford, &c., &c. Many of the churches omitted are among the most prominent ecclesiastical buildings of the county, and from what still remains of a like character, must have abounded with ornaments, etc., which would have been deemed, and in some cases were, really super stitious. Anyhow they have suffered by mutilation snd otherwise, equally with the rest. William Dowsing, with a disposition unworthy of respect, and apparently incapable of anything high and lofty, lias bequeathed to us this sad and unworthy memorial of indiscreet zeal. While it produces within us a feeling of strong revulsion at such practices as his, and the bitter spirit of which they doubtless were largely born, it should also lead us to reflect, whether there may not be after all, some cause for fear, lest we and our descend ,nts should desire and do the same things, which, have unfortunately caused the name of Dowsing to become famous. An old MS. of Dowsing's Journal in private posses sion, has the following variations inter alia from the generally received text. 18. STANSTED, is written < Sternfield ' 87. "KAYFIELD, April 3rd, 1644. My deputy broke down divers pictures, and I have done the rest." 94. Reads "Will. Aldice, Curate, and drunkard ffrancis Evered." 109. « Thirty Cherubims." 111. BLYFOED "twenty superstitious pictures" and "St. Andrew's cross in the window." 114. " Twenty Cherubims. " 137. ALLINGTON, " and Paul and another superstitious picture," in addition to those printed. 140. WANGFORD 1 , .« 141. WRENTHAMJ are wntten Aug- the 29th- P MM D CO II — „ TS'W J3 ft i:--3p- . . 81 - ! flJlJl? a> • =3 ^ §'43 O-t- § * ,a|-|^*^l mifs**! . 1 al 1*lP1a 'g-S ^ ^§r-l -3^02^5 Ro *aO^°l.|w •S'g „• S .^ fr 8 53 „ S-^d1^ P fl ii -s-g .a .££8 IIMli ~o^ • ^ tlD *rt ^ 03 OQ H £^-T« ? ls; -«JLi! 1*1 , „ - CO 3 S r-l S-> O -S ££sl|J|fj Lj aJ TO •> -*^ *^< oo • S gj~; "^ v. !> CG « ca c3*^ ® »S O ^ h>h^c§FM BO'S 60 jliiiy < fSjf^fS I1|B^§I H MB&Egs2« H . "O -,_c~S -'"' t— Jv» b° £ S ^ Oi ^ ° M ^ f ll?|llll|lll?ld a I j ^Www K S&A-.W iill . f j» .."08 fco2 «fla*|* g -o^Z, >> . SQ S 02 03 ^ S oi * ~.S S c 8.0 gg SS S^v iii -i*^ $'S g til ^>v .S^ s|l ^6> §"fe fe 61 -4 GO H H « 0 M Q £ AH 2d ax- 6. 1 «TS •g w S=> s-oSS « ^•S^'o 1 -jpfj* s s« 5*1 ||| 'Spqo o'Sf'O I e«2.2 " — O H I I 3J 5 Sx % ""aj 3 S*0 ffi 5 c — !§ N S fi >jC